Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

A.Villa v West Ham United

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3368
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 275 times
Been liked: 683 times

Villa A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

Massive match Sunday and we need to take something but a win will take and keep us out of the bottom three. 

Hopefully Summerville is back and if he is just one decision for Nuno to make and that is which of the centre backs misses out... Really tough decision for him as Disasi has been great since arriving, Dinos and Todibo were both outstanding against City. 

If Summerville isn't fit I'm guessing he'll go for another midfielder and hope he does as I'd prefer not to go three at the back again. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2631
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 435 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Mad Ferret »

stubbo wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 13:02 The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make.  CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.

It's a tough call.

Not like @Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
Fucking hell son, rent free or what.

Fwiw, how many people you see putting Potts in their predicted lineups these days? He's been shown to be utter gash.
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1365
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 744 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Tomshardware »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 12:17 Personally, I'd play Todibo right back instead of the give away a goal a game AWB. The top teams do it a lot with CB's, Arsenal are gonna win the league doing it. Gives us more stability, bit more arieally, and we won't be constantly targeted there. I also think he's quick enough and good on the ball to get forward at times, and he'll be over their winger like a rash.
That's a good shout, Todibo is also pretty good with the ball as well.   I like AWB but he has been at fault for goals quite a lot this season.
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 667
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 195 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post stubbo »

stubbo wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 13:02 The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make.  CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.

It's a tough call.

Not like @Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
Just seen he has and Scarles got the treatment lower down! 
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 667
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 195 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post stubbo »

The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make.  CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.

It's a tough call.

Not like Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8504
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4949 times
Been liked: 2660 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Massive Attack »

Can't shift out Mavropanos after that obscene herculean effort. 1st name on the team sheet! 😆
Rossal
Posts: 1011
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Rossal »

Mavro was unreal against City but for me our best pairing is Todibo and Disasi. Both quick, both good on the ball and both got a clean sheet last time away from home at Fulham. 
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1432
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 685 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Eerie Decent »

Personally, I'd play Todibo right back instead of the give away a goal a game AWB. The top teams do it a lot with CB's, Arsenal are gonna win the league doing it. Gives us more stability, bit more arieally, and we won't be constantly targeted there. I also think he's quick enough and good on the ball to get forward at times, and he'll be over their winger like a rash.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4531
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 1346 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post El Scorchio »

Manuel wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:39
El Scorchio" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:24
Manuel wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:12
He is quickly running out of time now to justify all the 'fuss' Nuno made with him, in fact I've almost given up on him being of much use at this point. Not a big deal financially, but we could have brought someone else in instead.
Not sure we could, for the absolute pittance we paid. We didn't even use our second loan slot in the end after sending Igor back. That tells a story about the state of things.
Possibly, think he's on 70k. There is always someone out there, christ even Lingard would have been better, but yea fair shout on the second loan slot.
Agree on the wages but I suppose that's the going rate now mad as it is- especially when you're desperate. The deal at least was 1 mill and then fuck all obligation if we go down which is good as we wouldn't be lumbered in the champ. I don't remember if there were any obligations if we stay up, though. The option of an extra year? Which I should think we wouldn't take. It is at least better than deals we've made in the past where from desperation we've signed similar players at similar situations and been stuck with them for 3-5 years. Hello Danny Ings, Luis Boa Morte and a truck load of others! I guess there was no-one better for that sort of favourable deal who was willing to come to a club who looked certs for relegation at the time.

I'm certainly not going to pretend he's made an impact at all aside from that first half against Brentford, but at least we can cut ties quickly and easily at the end of the season.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8504
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4949 times
Been liked: 2660 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Massive Attack »

Think it will be a draw and be happy enough with that but my god if we win it it'll turbo charge our survival chances and set us up nicely to stay up.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4689
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 605 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Manuel »

El Scorchio" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:24
Manuel wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:12
fraser wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:42
I thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked. 
He is quickly running out of time now to justify all the 'fuss' Nuno made with him, in fact I've almost given up on him being of much use at this point. Not a big deal financially, but we could have brought someone else in instead.
Not sure we could, for the absolute pittance we paid. We didn't even use our second loan slot in the end after sending Igor back. That tells a story about the state of things.
Possibly, think he's on 70k. There is always someone out there, christ even Lingard would have been better, but yea fair shout on the second loan slot.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1474
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 331 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Come On You Irons »

Yes, absolutely massive game and we are due a win at Villa.

They are on an awful run of form and still have loads of key players out injured. It's about time we bloody did them!
twoleftfeet
Posts: 3018
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 707 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post twoleftfeet »

Stop Rogers, stop Villa.

Simple as that.

At our place he was the difference between the 2 sides.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4531
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 1346 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post El Scorchio »

Manuel wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:12
fraser wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:42
Takashi Miike" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide left
I thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked. 
He is quickly running out of time now to justify all the 'fuss' Nuno made with him, in fact I've almost given up on him being of much use at this point. Not a big deal financially, but we could have brought someone else in instead.
Not sure we could, for the absolute pittance we paid. We didn't even use our second loan slot in the end after sending Igor back. That tells a story about the state of things.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4531
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 1346 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post El Scorchio »

We need more attacking impetus against Villa than we did against City, and their midfield being their strength, we need to get more in there to counter it particularly if they have players coming back from injury. (Just our luck if so)

Two at the back, and then pop Summerville back in if he's fit, if he's not then it's either Traore (although I suspect he'll be kept for later in the game) or an extra CM. It's a real shame we don't have that natural 10/AM player.
Council Scum
Posts: 783
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 287 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Council Scum »

Manuel wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:14
stubbo-admin wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:09 I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.

It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).

Mavropanos was our best player last game.  Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable.  And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.

I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.

My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
Fwiw, if he did leave a CB out I fancy it would be Todibo.
Agreed 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3368
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 275 times
Been liked: 683 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

stubbo-admin wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:09 I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.

It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).

Mavropanos was our best player last game.  Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable.  And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.

I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.

My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
If Jimmy is fit he has to start, when Taty and Pablo are pressing from the front is when he needs to be on the pitch to take advantage of the chaos especially as he will still be match fit it would only be 2 weeks 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4689
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 605 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Manuel »

stubbo-admin wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 10:09 I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.

It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).

Mavropanos was our best player last game.  Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable.  And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.

I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.

My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
Fwiw, if he did leave a CB out I fancy it would be Todibo.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4689
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 605 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Manuel »

fraser wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:42
Takashi Miike" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide left
I thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked. 
He is quickly running out of time now to justify all the 'fuss' Nuno made with him, in fact I've almost given up on him being of much use at this point. Not a big deal financially, but we could have brought someone else in instead.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 2013
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 404 times
Been liked: 963 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post stubbo-admin »

I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.

It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).

Mavropanos was our best player last game.  Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable.  And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.

I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.

My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4689
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 605 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Manuel »

Massive game, with one eye on the other fixture too. I agree that he won't go 3 at the back again regardless of Jimmy, we have to go for the win here, running out of games. I also wouldn't be shocked if Wilson gets a start.
Rossal
Posts: 1011
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Rossal »

             Hermads 

AWB  Disasi  Todibo  Diouf 

       Kante  Soucek 

Bowen   Fernandes  Pablo 

                Taty 
dealcanvey
Posts: 640
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 129 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post dealcanvey »

I think if Summerville is injured we will go with the same team as Man City.
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2631
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 435 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Mad Ferret »

.................Hermanson

Disasi.....Todibo.....Mav.....Mayers

Bowen.....Soucek.....Fernandes.....Diouf

......................Pablo

......................Taty
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3368
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 275 times
Been liked: 683 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide left
I thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked. 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 4292
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1346 times
Been liked: 1725 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Takashi Miike »

I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide left
Post Reply