Page 6 of 13
Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Nov 2025, 16:06
by THUNDERCLINT
Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.
Out the door 1st Jan.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 12:04
by El Scorchio
Seems like a good compromise if the player is OK with it.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 12:03
by Exiled In Surrey
Today’s Telegraph saying the club willing to sell him but only if they can keep him on loan to the end of the year.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 00:58
by nychammer
maybe when you play surrounded by a shower of shit you become another turd. Undoubted talent that just didn't couldn't do enough here. I don't for one minute believe the board instigated rumours that he wants out, is acting up etc. and I wish him well.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 00:18
by Manuel
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑14 Jan 2026, 23:51
He's generally shit wherever he's asked to play bar the occasional rare game in the Premier League. He doesn't suit any position consistently enough in it. 3rd rate cup competitions or French/Brazilian Leagues he can do a bit better in.
How many times do you have to keep saying you don't rate him?? We heard you the first hundred times. He doesn't come on here, so little point in laying into him day in day out.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 23:51
by Massive Attack
He's generally shit wherever he's asked to play bar the occasional rare game in the Premier League. He doesn't suit any position consistently enough in it. 3rd rate cup competitions or French/Brazilian Leagues he can do a bit better in.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 23:31
by Sir Alf
He’s been decent only as a number 8 playing deeper fir us. Just the same as at Lyon.
He thinks he some kind of creative, goal scoring number 10. He aint got the legs / speed for that.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 21:06
by Massive Attack
We tried that and even when he was surrounded by better players we still almost got relegated, even when he would line-up alongside Declan Rice. He's never been consistently good. Once in a blue moon he'll have a good game but they have always been few and far between. £50M this bloke cost us.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 19:41
by Kitchenette
Gank wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 15:06
I don't know, I still think we would be better buying players to get the best out of Paqueta than selling Paqueta to suit the dross that plays around him.
Agreed
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 19:36
by iphammer
We don't need cu$ts in our team who want to jump ship and aren't prepared to get us out of the mess we're in. He can fuck off.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:54
by Keep dreaming
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑14 Jan 2026, 16:51
This moody arrogant,play acting ball giving away, dissent red carding, "non" gambling, pretend phone throwing away, stroppy cսnt fucked off yet?
You beat me with that post


Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:51
by Mad Dog
This moody arrogant,play acting ball giving away, dissent red carding, "non" gambling, pretend phone throwing away, stroppy cսnt fucked off yet?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:24
by Massive Attack
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑14 Jan 2026, 14:25
Any Old Iron" wrote: ↑14 Jan 2026, 14:06
If it’s true that he went on strike at the weekend then we have no choice but to dump the cսnt.
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year. He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate.
Apparently since April 2024 Ederson has 4 times as many Premier League assists than this cսnt.
Sums it up.

Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 16:04
by Keep dreaming
Has this cսnt traveled yet?
If not, can anyone piss in his shoes and shit in his toilet bag?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 14:25
by THUNDERCLINT
Any Old Iron" wrote: ↑14 Jan 2026, 14:06
If it’s true that he went on strike at the weekend then we have no choice but to dump the cսnt.
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year. He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate.
Apparently since April 2024 Ederson has 4 times as many Premier League assists than this cսnt.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 14:23
by THUNDERCLINT
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026, 19:52
The £51m record signing was left out of the squad for Sunday’s FA Cup third round win over QPR after reacting badly to West Ham rejecting a £35m bid from Flamengo.
Who the fuck does this cսnt think he is?
He's Paqcunta, Lucas Paqcunta.
I just don't think you understand.
He's easy to go down and a total fucking clown.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 14 Jan 2026, 14:06
by Any Old Iron
If it’s true that he went on strike at the weekend then we have no choice but to dump the cսnt.
He’s been pissing me off more and more during the past year. He’s looked disinterested most of the time and contributes very little. Get rid of the horrible ingrate.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 19:52
by Massive Attack
The £51m record signing was left out of the squad for Sunday’s FA Cup third round win over QPR after reacting badly to West Ham rejecting a £35m bid from Flamengo.
Who the fuck does this cսnt think he is? Demanding he gets an instant move even at the expense of us losing out on a lot of dough we have already worked out on him.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Dec 2025, 08:14
by Gank
ag ag ag ag
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Dec 2025, 02:49
by Massive Attack
Gank wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 17:47
Yeah, that isn't what 'nince' means.
Oh yeah and what does, nince, mean then?
*scoffs on a nince pie*
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Dec 2025, 02:25
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 13:13
comparing him to a previous player that isn't Brady or a genuinely elite talent, i'd say Bish had as much ability but also the added work rate, character and consistency. I think Paq can and often has worked hard, but his bad days far outnumber the good ones
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 16 Dec 2025, 18:44
by twoleftfeet
BoleynGone wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 17:09
blimey
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors
Wonders will never cease! I’d rather see a no 9 picked instead of Paqueta.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 16 Dec 2025, 18:37
by fraser
BoleynGone wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 17:09
blimey
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors
The fact that you're agreeing with each other should set alarm bells off for BOTH of you...
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 16 Dec 2025, 17:47
by Gank
Yeah, that isn't what 'nince' means.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 16 Dec 2025, 17:35
by Keep dreaming
fraser wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 13:10
Nonce, go on then ill play why is he a nonce?
Theatrical, naive and card addiction.
Them 3 alone makes him a football nonce
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 16 Dec 2025, 17:09
by BoleynGone
blimey
that;s twice on the same page I've agreed with 2LEFT TEST
Even Earthy over Paqueta,he's done more in the u21's than Paqueta has for the seniors