West Ham Online

Posted: **30 Nov 2025, 16:06**

Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 22:43**

Not the sort you need in a relegation dog fight.
Flatters to deceive most of the time...and a fucking liability a lot of the time.
Braindead cսnt

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 22:38**

Replace him with Ward-Prowse whose safety-first passing makes for much better statistics

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 22:35**

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:54**

Tomshardware wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:39
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:28 Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space.

Frustrating as his mistake was you can't really accuse him of being anonymous.

That was slightly harsh of me. He did try but he just doesn’t seem to have a pass or goal in him anymore. I think a fresh start is best for all parties.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:39**

twoleftfeet wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:28 Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space.

Frustrating as his mistake was you can't really accuse him of being anonymous.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:35**

Gank wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:21 He also played the most impressive pass of the entire match, the through ball to Bowen who lazily didn't bother getting onside properly so the goal was chalked off, which will have delighted you and your assist stats for Paqueta.

So a moment that didn't count is the best we can now hope for from Paqueta against a moment that did for Villa? Time to sell and get what we can and move on from him.

He's become a serious liability in the side now, if it aint gifting the opposition equalisers, it's getting himself suspended, not just once but twice after just 13 League games as soon as he just came back.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:29**

Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:23 I've become increasingly disillusioned with him over the pasty couple of seasons.

I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores

If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.

That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.

He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays

Hard to argue against that, although if we understand his frustration at the FA and refs who almost ruined his life, I won't let the occasion of Liverpool affect my judgement of him as he's a young Brazilian bloke, he won't have appreciated the gravity of Bonds' death.

I'm probably too old school to use West Ham forums (fora?) these days, I support West Ham for love and entertainment and really loved our time in the Championship so risky flair players letting us down and getting us off our seats in equal measures is as important to me as the grafters whereas tourists and the sort of West Ham supporters who live on the internet these days would be happier with those same grafters I value but swapping the flair players for a load of cloggers and ball holders if it guaranteed survival.

Nobody likes Sullivan but he does get an easy ride by sanctioning more Igor Julio's and Max Kilmans than Paolo Di Canios and Lucas Paquetas

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:28**

Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:23**

I've become increasingly disillusioned with him over the pasty couple of seasons.

I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores

If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.

That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.

He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:21**

He also played the most impressive pass of the entire match, the through ball to Bowen who lazily didn't bother getting onside properly so the goal was chalked off, which will have delighted you and your assist stats for Paqueta.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 20:01**

He certainly defended well for the Team needlessly gifting back possession to Villa in our half of the pitch that then led to Rogers 1st goal and Villas equaliser to get them back in the game just after half time. Nothing responsible and playing for the Team about that costly error showboating.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 19:51**

Anyone who was actually there today will have appreciated the tremendous work rate of this bloke, by far our hardest working player today. You just won't see that on the telly.

He puts a shift in trying to defend as well, he's just not great at it.

Some of the risks he takes are frustrating but that's what you get from technically brilliant flair players.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 19:45**

Ship him out in January. Get two in. Yeah the 85 mil from City is long gone, but there will be takers. January we need to roll our sleeves up and get stuck in. A couple of nasty bastards even, not this showboating cսnt.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 18:49**

Sweep wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 16:40 If Newcastle offered us Harvey Barnes or Anthony Elanga in return I reckon we'd take it.

I'd take Harvey Price for the cսnt.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 17:34**

*Correction - He was involved in Villa’s Rogers goal by getting caught dicking about on the ball gifting it back to them

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 17:12**

Yet another game is fails to create an assist, his 60th consecutive match in a row and not involved in either goal. Carrying the waste of space these days.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 17:11**

wils wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 17:05 Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative.

He is gash! Potts, Magassa and Fernandes all outshone him.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 17:05**

Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 16:58**

Can’t work out who was worse, Paq or Potts.

Magassa and Fernandes were mustard.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 16:40**

If Newcastle offered us Harvey Barnes or Anthony Elanga in return I reckon we'd take it.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 16:06**

It's become a running joke with Paqueta now...He does it so often that other teams actively press and target him for that very reason.

Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.

Posted: **14 Dec 2025, 15:22**

Costs us yet another goal and potentially 2 points.

Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.

Posted: **06 Dec 2025, 11:36**

Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:35
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.

So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks

You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.

Yep and we also didn't lose or won the previous times we played the same opposition with him in the team therefore the results didn't improve..
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really

Posted: **06 Dec 2025, 11:35**

fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:20
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.

Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.

So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks

You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.

Posted: **06 Dec 2025, 11:33**

Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:20
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:15
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.

They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match.

Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.

So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks

Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof...

West Ham Online

Crapaqueta

Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta

Re: Crapaqueta