West Ham Online

only1billybonds wrote: ↑14 Mar 2026, 08:45 I think a lot of added spice gets chucked in when you consider that they are the closest thing to being a club from the East End, they played originally on the IOD. Although West Ham have always been in East London,we were never based in the actual East End. For old cunts like me who originate from that part of the smoke, it was always a fact that we found irksome at times

Grumpster wrote: ↑13 Mar 2026, 21:02 Always find it odd when our supporters give more of a shit about spurs than millwall, but I guess people of a certain age have only ever known specific rivalries or gone to school with knobs who support spurs.

For my entire lifetime, spurs have just been a laughing stock with deluded shit fans where as millwall have been millwall, cunts.

As a man who'd like relegation to get away from the cսnt that is VAR and to play our ACTUAL rivals, would be fucking typical if the cunts got promoted when we went down.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑13 Mar 2026, 17:53

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑13 Mar 2026, 01:36

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 02:14 Millwall aren't our biggest rivals. You can only have a meaningful rivalry with a club you play against and Millwall are never good enough to do this except for the odd cup match or in one of our rare relegation years.

They are though our most hated club, which is not quite the same thing.

 

How come I always look out for their results then..?

It's always  been Wall above all others for me

Fair enough. It's not for me to tell you what to think..

I don't ever look out for there results, though when I do see they've lost, it always gives me a warm glow. So I despise them without really giving a shit about them. 

For instance, should Tottenham get relegated, I will laugh my tits off. Last time Millwall got relegated, I was sort of amused and definitely pleased, but didn't reach any level of pure joy because they are a tiny, shit club who were always going down.

mallard wrote: ↑13 Mar 2026, 18:38 Would half and half scarfs be available for this potential fixture?

HaHa 
 

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑13 Mar 2026, 01:36

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 02:14 Millwall aren't our biggest rivals. You can only have a meaningful rivalry with a club you play against and Millwall are never good enough to do this except for the odd cup match or in one of our rare relegation years.

They are though our most hated club, which is not quite the same thing.

 

How come I always look out for their results then..?

It's always  been Wall above all others for me

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑13 Mar 2026, 01:27

Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 11:01 Millwall v West Ham

11am Sunday KO.

Reckon the compromised Met alongside their gaffer - the hook nosed smurf muzzie  cսnt - will go down the Glasgow route and ban all away fans 

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 02:14 Millwall aren't our biggest rivals. You can only have a meaningful rivalry with a club you play against and Millwall are never good enough to do this except for the odd cup match or in one of our rare relegation years.

They are though our most hated club, which is not quite the same thing.

Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 11:01 Millwall v West Ham

11am Sunday KO.

Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 15:12 PACK IT IN 

Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 14:59 FOR FUCK'S SAKE STOP SPAMMING UP EVERY FUCKING THREAD ON THIS FORUM YOU BORING SELF-OBSESSED FUCKING CUNTS.

XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 14:44

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 13:46

XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 13:07

Like you not really being entitled to pension rise in April or holding Chelsea badge....you old fiddler which isn't a reference to sucking off trannies

OK, I'll play. Where's your proof (not an interpretation of what you've read - or wanted to read - on here)?

You only believe what you hope will give you a chance for getting back at me for remembering what you posted in your childish attempt to join the night crew back in the dot com days of WHO.

You know what, joyo, for someone who is adamant that they are an atheist, your life seems to be dominated by a whole raft of beliefs, more akin to some uneducated but indoctrinated Muslim fundamentalist.

Don't worry though, son. There's a potential opening for someone with such a mindset. Come pantomime season. should the woke brigade demand that any of the classic fairy (ooh!) tales be updated, you'd be a shoo- in for the role of Comedy Suicide Bomber.

Tea towel round your shiny bald ginger noggin, Aldi budget backpack and a dab of Cherry Blossom and the role is yours.

I know your juices are already flowing at the thought of hundreds of kids focused on you screaming "He's behind you!", but that is not what they'll be saying.

They'll all be using word association to let you know they'd sussed you out. They'll be saying "His behind" and "You".

Ho Ho Ho.

I ain't reading that because its going to be utter bollocks plus very enjoyable knowing you have bitten (not a reference you're mouth on ladyboy cock)

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 13:46

XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 13:07

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 11:17

Far better, then, that posters put up a list of subjects and styles that they, personally, find acceptable and agreeable, and, to keep it positive, no mention whatsoever of what subjects/styles they don't find acceptable or agreeable - because that would be an attempt to censor free speech, innit?

Once they've made their preferences clear and unambiguous we can then see if they garner the respect they believe they are entitled to.

Like you not really being entitled to pension rise in April or holding Chelsea badge....you old fiddler which isn't a reference to sucking off trannies

OK, I'll play. Where's your proof (not an interpretation of what you've read - or wanted to read - on here)?

You only believe what you hope will give you a chance for getting back at me for remembering what you posted in your childish attempt to join the night crew back in the dot com days of WHO.

You know what, joyo, for someone who is adamant that they are an atheist, your life seems to be dominated by a whole raft of beliefs, more akin to some uneducated but indoctrinated Muslim fundamentalist.

Don't worry though, son. There's a potential opening for someone with such a mindset. Come pantomime season. should the woke brigade demand that any of the classic fairy (ooh!) tales be updated, you'd be a shoo- in for the role of Comedy Suicide Bomber.

Tea towel round your shiny bald ginger noggin, Aldi budget backpack and a dab of Cherry Blossom and the role is yours.

I know your juices are already flowing at the thought of hundreds of kids focused on you screaming "He's behind you!", but that is not what they'll be saying.

They'll all be using word association to let you know they'd sussed you out. They'll be saying "His behind" and "You".

Ho Ho Ho.

XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 13:07

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 11:17

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 06:39

Unfortunately not. Very difficult to make that work. 

Far better, then, that posters put up a list of subjects and styles that they, personally, find acceptable and agreeable, and, to keep it positive, no mention whatsoever of what subjects/styles they don't find acceptable or agreeable - because that would be an attempt to censor free speech, innit?

Once they've made their preferences clear and unambiguous we can then see if they garner the respect they believe they are entitled to.

Like you not really being entitled to pension rise in April or holding Chelsea badge....you old fiddler which isn't a reference to sucking off trannies

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 11:17

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 06:39

Manuel wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 02:08

I foed this oddball, repetitive, conspiracy theorist bore as I could no longer stomach reading his mundane crap. Is there any way, the system can be tweaked where one doesn't see posts of foed posters when another poster quotes posts?

Unfortunately not. Very difficult to make that work. 

Far better, then, that posters put up a list of subjects and styles that they, personally, find acceptable and agreeable, and, to keep it positive, no mention whatsoever of what subjects/styles they don't find acceptable or agreeable - because that would be an attempt to censor free speech, innit?

Once they've made their preferences clear and unambiguous we can then see if they garner the respect they believe they are entitled to.

stubbo-admin wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 06:39

Manuel wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 02:08

XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Mar 2026, 01:19

Zźzzźzzźźzzz 

I foed this oddball, repetitive, conspiracy theorist bore as I could no longer stomach reading his mundane crap. Is there any way, the system can be tweaked where one doesn't see posts of foed posters when another poster quotes posts?

Unfortunately not. Very difficult to make that work.