West Ham Online

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:43

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:38

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15

Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.

The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?

If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?

1 Regime at a time ya war hawk!  Although Trump does have an excellent relationship with Jong-Un so we await what happens with that. 

And Iran chose to continue on with their nuclear enrichment program ambitions after last June refusing to play ball with the Regime making it clear they wish to attack America. 


As for smashing Irans forces being wiped off the map so far in under 3 days alongside the IDF:

- 48 top Commanders killed including Top cսnt Khamenei
- 10 Navy Ships
- Military Headquarters 
- Over 1200 targetted sites
- Hezzbollah top intelligence Official and key sites in Lebanon 

Well ahead of schedule not expecting to be that successful although under Trump they do have previous for successful missions involving Midnight Hammer and taking out Irans Major Gen Soleimani back in 2020 all. 

Keep up the great work.

Don't forget the school they blew to bits as well.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:38

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05

I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.

Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.

The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?

If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?

1 Regime at a time ya war hawk!  Although Trump does have an excellent relationship with Jong-Un so we await what happens with that. 

And Iran chose to continue on with their nuclear enrichment program ambitions after last June refusing to play ball with the Regime making it clear they wish to attack America. 


As for smashing Irans forces being wiped off the map so far in under 3 days alongside the IDF:

- 48 top Commanders killed including Top cսnt Khamenei
- 10 Navy Ships
- Military Headquarters 
- Over 1200 targetted sites
- Hezzbollah top intelligence Official and key sites in Lebanon 

Well ahead of schedule not expecting to be that successful although under Trump they do have previous for successful missions involving Midnight Hammer and taking out Irans Major Gen Soleimani back in 2020 all. 

Keep up the great work.

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:15

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:55

But at the time everyone believed it was the right thing to do, history tells a different story. So how history views this war remains to be seen.

I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.

Everything was clear long after the invasion had started.
Everyone thought removing the taliban was the right thing to do at the time as well.

The US intelligence suggested last year that Iran had been set back decades in their quest for nuclear weapons. Did they lie?

If it’s about nuclear capability then why aren’t they bombing North Korea?

1 Regime at a time ya war hawk!  Although Trump does have an excellent relationship with Jong-Un so we await what happens with that. 

And Iran chose to continue on with their nuclear enrichment program ambitions after last June refusing to play ball with the Regime making it clear they wish to attack America. 


As for smashing Irans forces being wiped off the map so far in under 3 days alongside the IDF:

- 48 top Commanders killed including Top cսnt Khamenei
- 10 Navy Ships
- Military Headquarters 
- Over 1200 targetted sites
- Hezzbollah top intelligence Official and key sites in Lebanon 
- Heavily damaged Iran's naval headquarters
- Destroyed countless stockpiles of missiles and drones


Well ahead of schedule not expecting to be that successful although under Trump they do have previous for successful missions involving Midnight Hammer and taking out Irans Major Gen Soleimani back in 2020 all. 

Keep up the great work.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 19:05

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:55

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40

That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it. 

But at the time everyone believed it was the right thing to do, history tells a different story. So how history views this war remains to be seen.

I personally didn't and many like me agreed at the time. What was it, an estimated million or so that marched in London. The difference with that and Iran is not only their 50 year war waged on the western world and in the middle east by terrorist proxy but also they didn't ramp up nuclear capability to over 60% for no other reason than to use it as a weapon, they only need 3% enrichment for domestic energy use only. That shit back in Iraq under Hussain was clearly (to me) sexed up to fuck back then to justify that campaign.

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:55

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:37

I reckon George bush thought the same thing.

That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it. 

But at the time everyone believed it was the right thing to do, history tells a different story. So how history views this war remains to be seen.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:40

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:37

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 17:37 The bloke's judgement and decisiveness in foreign military policy is outstanding. Not just for the sake of his own Country but also for the sake of the wider world. This is where he is most impressive. The history books on that score will judge him extremely favourably over the course of his two terms. The World will be in a much safer place once he's finished his 2nd term for years to come.

I reckon George bush thought the same thing.

That Berks involvement in the middle east doesn't come close to how Trump has managed it. 

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 18:37

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 17:37 The bloke's judgement and decisiveness in foreign military policy is outstanding. Not just for the sake of his own Country but also for the sake of the wider world. This is where he is most impressive. The history books on that score will judge him extremely favourably over the course of his two terms. The World will be in a much safer place once he's finished his 2nd term for years to come.

I reckon George bush thought the same thing.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 17:37 The bloke's judgement and decisiveness in foreign military policy is outstanding. Not just for the sake of his own Country but also for the sake of the wider world. This is where he is most impressive. The history books on that score will judge him extremely favourably over the course of his two terms. The World will be in a much safer place once he's finished his 2nd term for years to come.

Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 16:59 Trump at the White House to present medals to servicemen and he babbles on about the curtains. Surely even the hardened MagaTs must realise he's got dementia 

XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 14:15

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 14:03

XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 14:01

I'm not a fan of Trump or some of his idiotic politics but on this occasion he has my backing not that is gonna make much difference 
You on other hand are a mullah mouthpiece and surrender monkey...must be something do do with Italian bottlejob thinking 

a rapist backing a rapist - imagine my shock.

like i said, if you're so happy for others to risk their lives why dont you jump on your bike and head over there?? you might pick up a new 'girlfriend'.

I'm surprised the amount of time you spend on here that you actually make the call for prayer 4 times a day...Allah Akbar surrender monkey 

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:53 Has the FIFA Peace Prize recipient finished so he can add US / Iran to his made up list of wars ended?

Then we can get back to the Epstein / Trump files and finally nail the disgusting paedo

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 14:03

XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 14:01

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:51

You're not bringing about regime change sitting behind long range missiles.

Meanwhile you can blow the shit out of Iran and not worry about the odd school getting vaperised in the meantime.

No surprises that you worship a fellow ginger rapist.

I'm not a fan of Trump or some of his idiotic politics but on this occasion he has my backing not that is gonna make much difference 
You on other hand are a mullah mouthpiece and surrender monkey...must be something do do with Italian bottlejob thinking 

a rapist backing a rapist - imagine my shock.

like i said, if you're so happy for others to risk their lives why dont you jump on your bike and head over there?? you might pick up a new 'girlfriend'.

XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 14:01

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:51

XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:44

Ha ha you thicko bellend...one thing Trump ain't going to do is invade .....bomb the shit out if the fuckers from air and sea but definitely no troops no invasion 
Ah bless the Mullah mouthpiece is all confused 

You're not bringing about regime change sitting behind long range missiles.

Meanwhile you can blow the shit out of Iran and not worry about the odd school getting vaperised in the meantime.

No surprises that you worship a fellow ginger rapist.

I'm not a fan of Trump or some of his idiotic politics but on this occasion he has my backing not that is gonna make much difference 
You on other hand are a mullah mouthpiece and surrender monkey...must be something do do with Italian bottlejob thinking 

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:51

XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:44

goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:33

You’re the one desperate to invade a foreign country.

Ha ha you thicko bellend...one thing Trump ain't going to do is invade .....bomb the shit out if the fuckers from air and sea but definitely no troops no invasion 
Ah bless the Mullah mouthpiece is all confused 

You're not bringing about regime change sitting behind long range missiles.

Meanwhile you can blow the shit out of Iran and not worry about the odd school getting vaperised in the meantime.

No surprises that you worship a fellow ginger rapist.

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 13:29 yet another illegal war, but at this point the collective west behave like nodding dogs in regard to the united states of israel, and the orange sex pest will continue doing as he's told