West Ham Online

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Nutsin wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 19:00

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

 

What you will find is Anon and the other libs on here can only post messages of criticism of Trump but have very little else to offer on any debate about anything. Probably because all the Libs have very little to offer by way of policy that make sense.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

 

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:06

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?









 

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Geezer was half expecting a shoot-out when in the close vicinity of ICE agents. Thick as mince prat fucked about and found out, as they say. 

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:14

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?





 

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Was the protest at Capitol Hill Peaceful or an incitement to violence then? plenty of guns on display there

only1billybonds wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:48
So much of the recent unrest In Minneapolis is a result of who is in the White House.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:18

And what about assault rifles?

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

Nutsin wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:27

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:18 Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide

I agree with all of the above, however you need to use a little common sense with such a responsibility, don’t you agree?

 

Attention should be drawn to Nurse's post at 15.09.

Under Obama, 51 civilians died at the hands of ICE agents. These same agents received nothing but applause from the left wing media/establishment.

Obama deported more than 8 million people during his two terms.

Obama pinned a madal on Tom Homan, the Trump appointed border czar. Homan is now seen as a menace to the public.

So much of the recent unrest In Minneapolis is a result of who is in the White House.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:18 Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide

Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?




 

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:18

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 14:32

 

A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.

And what about assault rifles?

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?







 

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?



 

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:18

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 14:32

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:45

What's the issue with a laser sight? if you had to use one why wouldn't you want to shoot straight? 

 

A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.

And what about assault rifles?

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 14:32

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:45

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:33

Why would you take a firearm to a vigil/protest?

And not just a regular run of the mill concealled carry straight out of the box one but one which is laser sighted...

What's the issue with a laser sight? if you had to use one why wouldn't you want to shoot straight? 

 

A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.

Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?
Someone should tell the NRA that they are being undermined by Republicans 
Man up you soft cock commies

Not aware of Obama sending untrained masked gunmen onto the streets to shoot people dead during the course of identifying and removing illegals

 

The Governor Tim Walz spoke with Trump about ICE and what’s happened and Trump told him that he will be happy to reduce ICE numbers if the police co-operate amd hand over the criminals instead of letting them back out on the street. 
Trump is not going to allow the Sancguary city madness to continue.
As for Walz he’s probably trying to negotiate a pardon for his involvement in all the fraud that’s been going on where there are whistleblowers and evidence verifying he knew it was happening but allowed it because it funded the Dem party.

the Dems are rotten to the core.
 

Bottom line, if Saint Barak of Obama was driving these deportations of illegals, no one would care. 

More slave trade nonsense

£1.1 mill for a vanity project? Constantly harping on about the slave trade never the work done to stop it. 

If they want to build a memorial, do it for those who lost their lives stopping human trafficking, and shame the African chieftains who sold their own people. 

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 14:13 I don't have an issue with how they remove offending illegals, don't have an issue with targeted arrests full stop, it's more their routine "check ins" of places of work and rounding up of working illegals that all feels a little "where are your papers?" and wearing masks and balaclavas is reinforcing that image.

 

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:45

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:33

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 11:45 Yes, Trump did say the bloke murdered shouldn’t have been carrying a legal gun in a holster which was taken off him
I guess he is finally coming round to the idea that citizens walking round with guns is insane 
Maybe that’s progress … or a bit more dementia 

Why would you take a firearm to a vigil/protest?

And not just a regular run of the mill concealled carry straight out of the box one but one which is laser sighted...

What's the issue with a laser sight? if you had to use one why wouldn't you want to shoot straight? 

 

a vegetable hosts pmqs 

https://www.youtube.com/live/fhC6OSzozF ... E-v_NMUMlz