West Ham Online

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:23

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:16

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:08

What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 

 

So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser  

 

I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:16

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:08

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:59

Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?

What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 

 

So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser  

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:13

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:58 5% GDP  
​
​​​ no wonder you failed that GCSE

That’s the Atlanta Fed forecast, they forecast 5.4- 5.6%. They have the reputation of having the best model for this. Those that know this follow it, markets and investors pay attention to this. It matters a whole lot more than your silly backward looking data points.

The mere fact that you don’t understand that it’s what’s in front of us that counts says it all.

Once again you are proving just how little you understand economics and markets.

It’s below GCSE grade. Did you graduate high school?

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 16:08

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:56

What a load of bollocks!

Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?

What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 

So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser  

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:58 5% GDP  
​
​​​ no wonder you failed that GCSE

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:56

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:53

 

Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age  

What a load of bollocks!

Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:56

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:53

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:31

 

I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 

 

Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age  

What a load of bollocks!

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:53

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:31

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 08:06

We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day

 

I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 

 

Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age  

Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:31

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 08:06

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:58

I think we all know it happened.

Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.


But thanks for the laugh!

We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day

 

I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 

Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age  

Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 05:00 _{Nutjob. Is there nothing the retard in the Whire House can do or say that you would criticize? Y}



 

nychammer wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:19 Nazi, Facist, Communist, Stalinist  -  all 'dramatic' labels thrown by one side against the other. 



 

goose wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 08:06

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:58

goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:49

Yup thought as much. 
Never happened did it?

I think we all know it happened.

Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.


But thanks for the laugh!

We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 10:56 The rise of Nigel has been good as it’s outed all the Tories who thought their party didn’t goose step enough
A bit like how Trump has rallied the inner fascist of Republicans 
 

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 00:36

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58

 

He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."

Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though 

What the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.

And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 00:36

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58

 

He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."

Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though 

What the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.

And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 08:09 Donald Trump dodged the draft 5 times mostly by his father paying a doctor to say his ‘bone spurs’ made him unfit for service
Should have used early onset dementia as a more likely excuse

Where are those Epstein files by the way?
Impeach the paedo
 

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 00:36

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58

 

He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."

Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though 

What the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.

And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:58

goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:49

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47

We all know what happened, stop lying!

the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!

Priceless!

Yup thought as much. 
Never happened did it?

I think we all know it happened.

Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.


But thanks for the laugh!

We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day