West Ham Online

Odds slashed from 5/1 to 7/2.

Watch this space.

I think we're fucked.

Yep, agree with 'Arry on that.

Can't really blame Nuno. He set us up brilliantly in that first half, and even at the start of the 2nd, we were going for a 3rd.

And should've gone 3-2 up at the end before they went and won it.

To be fair, I was listening to Arry talking to Geo about the match and he said that from his experience as a manager, it didn't really matter what Nuno did or didn't do and it was Chelsea putting the pressure on us and driving us back regardless. Geo definitely tried to lead him into saying bringing Kilman on was a mistake, but he said it wouldn't have mattered whether he bought on a defender or an attacker. The tide had turned.

Issue is always gonna be nuno's negative tactics.

Unlucky not being 3 or 4 up on saturday, but to go so fucking defensive so early was ridiculous.

99% of us knew the game was lost as soon as he bought that useless cսnt kilman on.

Play to our strengths and we have a chance and our strengths are certainly not defending, even Burnley have better centre backs.

We should beat Burnley and indeed we must. However our already weak defence is now an enormous question mark. Kilman and Mav together puts the shits right up me. Do we start Disasi, if he's even ready to start? Do we plug in Magassa or Soucek there? You'd have to be tempted.

3 against Sunderland in the first half and 2 against Chelsea in the second half, so I think we will have too much for Burnley

Sir Alf" wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 12:16 We have failed every “biggest game of the season” so far and the run of them around xmas.

On what planet does anyone think we will be mentally or physically strong enough to overcome Burnley with their crowd feeling its genuinely a chance for a rare win. 

If its purely a law if probability thing fine but can anyone explain how we use our painfully thin squad to not materially weaken when we have to sub our front 2 and others which we gave to do most games.  Not using Potts and Magassa and the legs of someone like Mayers  or KWP seems to be the only option not tried by Nuno. But even if we do that, not having Todibo and having to play Kilman feels like a death sentence?

We have failed every “biggest game of the season” so far and the run of them around xmas.

On what planet does anyone think we will be mentally or physically strong enough to overcome Burnley with their crowd feeling its genuinely a chance for a rare win. 

If its purely a law if probability thing fine but can anyone explain how we use our painfully thin squad to not materially weaken when we have to sub our front 2 and others which we gave to do most games.  Not using Potts and Magassa and the legs of someone like Mayers  or KWP seems to be the only option not tried by Nuno. But even if we do that, not having Todibo and having to play Kilman feels like a death sentence?

Tomshardware wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 08:21 A win against Burnley and we will be on the coattails of either Leeds or Forest or both if they draw on Friday evening.    

Burnley is now possibly our biggest game of the season. Just to set up the next game which will then be the biggest game of the season and so on and so forth. 

twoleftfeet wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 09:06 I didn’t realise that we have gone 21 league games without a clean sheet plus the 5th worse defensive record in Europe.

Phenomenal. 

I didn’t realise that we have gone 21 league games without a clean sheet plus the 5th worse defensive record in Europe.

Phenomenal. 

A win against Burnley and we will be on the coattails of either Leeds or Forest or both if they draw on Friday evening.    

Rossal wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 08:04 Got a load of grief a month ago for calling it an asset strip and Sullivan happy to go down whilst pocketing cash. 

After that window leaving our squad thinner and a negative net spend.....

Where is the intent to stay up and where is the money?    Anyone care to explain..... 


 

Got a load of grief a month ago for calling it an asset strip and Sullivan happy to go down whilst pocketing cash. 

After that window leaving our squad thinner and a negative net spend.....

Where is the intent to stay up and where is the money?    Anyone care to explain..... 

 

Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 06:08 "In West Ham's case, despite a gut-wrenching 3-2 defeat by Chelsea on Saturday night, the numbers make for slightly better reading, with the Hammers' chance of safety rated at 17.06%.

With a game against strugglers Burnley to come next week, West Ham - who looked dead and buried a month ago - are now starting to play with the freedom of a side with nothing to lose and everything to gain"

The beeb puts a stat and a bit of hope.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/arti ... dgjj6e31mo

"In West Ham's case, despite a gut-wrenching 3-2 defeat by Chelsea on Saturday night, the numbers make for slightly better reading, with the Hammers' chance of safety rated at 17.06%.

With a game against strugglers Burnley to come next week, West Ham - who looked dead and buried a month ago - are now starting to play with the freedom of a side with nothing to lose and everything to gain"

The beeb puts a stat and a bit of hope.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/arti ... dgjj6e31mo

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026, 22:41 I've long thought Leeds would be the one's to catch realistically. They are the newly promoted Club with a manager who will feel the pressure and someone who has struggled in the past to keep them in the division (Leeds and Norwich) so he doesn't have the know-how, Dyche does who also has a better set up at Forest. We play them last game of the season at the cesspit and I think is our best bet of staying up. What I don't want to see Friday is Leeds winning, a draw or Forest winning would feel the better outcome for me.

What a desperate fucking mess though to be in thanks to Nuno and the Owners. 

Bless you lads. While its mathematically possible to survive, fans can still hope I guess but for me its been over since xmas. Too weak in key areas of the squad before the season began and not addressed this window.  Burnley will see us as a chance for 3 points and beat us I think especially since Kilman and Mavropanos will start. 

Sullivan is only interested in managing the cash flow now to keep the listless ship, that is West Ham, afloat for the immediate term before we go down. 

Sullivan, when we go down, will officially become the worst owner in our 126 year history.  Screwed the club over financially and as a footballing force and we will be back to where we were in the 1950s, a second tier club.

Can't really see us getting out of this.

Gannin doon like a homesick mole.

I've long thought Leeds would be the one's to catch realistically. They are the newly promoted Club with a manager who will feel the pressure and someone who has struggled in the past to keep them in the division (Leeds and Norwich) so he doesn't have the know-how, Dyche does who also has a better set up at Forest. We play them last game of the season at the cesspit and I think is our best bet of staying up. What I don't want to see Friday is Leeds winning, a draw or Forest winning would feel the better outcome for me.

What a desperate fucking mess though to be in thanks to Nuno and the Owners. 

We're 6 behind them and a shot goal difference, they can actually win home games.
what on earth makes you think we'll overtake them?  

Fancy us surviving over Leeds.

Just a point conceded to Forest, not a great change. Still time and points. Take it game at a time blar blar blar.

What Burnley need is a match against us

White flag being raised over the bowl as we speak.   

Funeral march to replace Bubbles before each game.  

A slow “death march” to the championship gets fully underway now.  

Only positive might be that it wakes up a few fans to the protests.