Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Crapaqueta

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 2355
Has liked: 1529 times
Been liked: 812 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Not the sort you need in a relegation dog fight.
Flatters to deceive most of the time...and a fucking liability a lot of the time.
Braindead cսnt
Gank
Posts: 1198
Has liked: 979 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

Replace him with Ward-Prowse whose safety-first passing makes for much better statistics 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

twoleftfeet
Posts: 3010
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 706 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post twoleftfeet »

Tomshardware wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 20:39
twoleftfeet wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 20:28 Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space. 
Frustrating as his mistake was you can't really accuse him of being anonymous.  
That was slightly harsh of me. He did try but he just doesn’t seem to have a pass or goal in him anymore. I think a fresh start is best for all parties. 
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1357
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 742 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Tomshardware »

twoleftfeet wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 20:28 Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space. 
Frustrating as his mistake was you can't really accuse him of being anonymous.  
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

Gank wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 20:21 He also played the most impressive pass of the entire match, the through ball to Bowen who lazily didn't bother getting onside properly so the goal was chalked off, which will have delighted you and your assist stats for Paqueta.

So a moment that didn't count is the best we can now hope for from Paqueta against a moment that did for Villa? Time to sell and get what we can and move on from him.

He's become a serious liability in the side now, if it aint gifting the opposition equalisers, it's getting himself suspended, not just once but twice after just 13 League games as soon as he just came back. 
Gank
Posts: 1198
Has liked: 979 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

Gary Strodders shank" wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 20:23 I've become increasingly disillusioned with him over the pasty couple of seasons.

I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores 

If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.

That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.

He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays 





 
 
 
Hard to argue against that, although if we understand his frustration at the FA and refs who almost ruined his life, I won't let the occasion of Liverpool affect my judgement of him as he's a young Brazilian bloke, he won't have appreciated the gravity of Bonds' death.

I'm probably too old school to use West Ham forums (fora?) these days, I support West Ham for love and entertainment and really loved our time in the Championship so risky flair players letting us down and getting us off our seats in equal measures is as important to me as the grafters whereas tourists and the sort of West Ham supporters who live on the internet these days would be happier with those same grafters I value but swapping the flair players for a load of cloggers and ball holders if it guaranteed survival.

Nobody likes Sullivan but he does get an easy ride by sanctioning more Igor Julio's and Max Kilmans  than Paolo Di Canios and Lucas Paquetas
twoleftfeet
Posts: 3010
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 706 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post twoleftfeet »

Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space. 
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 1046
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 198 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gary Strodders shank »

I've become increasingly disillusioned with him over the pasty couple of seasons.

I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores 

If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.

That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.

He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays 



 
Gank
Posts: 1198
Has liked: 979 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

He also played the most impressive pass of the entire match, the through ball to Bowen who lazily didn't bother getting onside properly so the goal was chalked off, which will have delighted you and your assist stats for Paqueta.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

He certainly defended well for the Team needlessly gifting back possession to Villa in our half of the pitch that then led to Rogers 1st goal and Villas equaliser to get them back in the game just after half time. Nothing responsible and playing for the Team about that costly error showboating.
Gank
Posts: 1198
Has liked: 979 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

Anyone who was actually there today will have appreciated the tremendous work rate of this bloke, by far our hardest working player today. You just won't see that on the telly.

He puts a shift in trying to defend as well, he's just not great at it.

Some of the risks he takes are frustrating but that's what you get from technically brilliant flair players. 
simons
Posts: 190
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post simons »

Ship him out in January. Get two in. Yeah the 85 mil from City is long gone, but there will be takers. January we need to roll our sleeves up and get stuck in. A couple of nasty bastards even, not this showboating cսnt. 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Sweep wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 16:40 If Newcastle offered us Harvey Barnes or Anthony Elanga in return I reckon we'd take it.
I'd take Harvey Price for the cսnt.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

*Correction - He was involved in Villa’s Rogers goal by getting caught dicking about on the ball gifting it back to them 💩 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

Yet another game is fails to create an assist, his 60th consecutive match in a row and not involved in either goal. Carrying the waste of space these days.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 3010
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 706 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post twoleftfeet »

wils wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 17:05 Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative. 
He is gash! Potts, Magassa and Fernandes all outshone him. 
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1254
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 544 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2623
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 432 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Mad Ferret »

Can’t work out who was worse, Paq or Potts.

Magassa and Fernandes were mustard.
User avatar
Sweep
Posts: 284
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Sweep »

If Newcastle offered us Harvey Barnes or Anthony Elanga in return I reckon we'd take it.
eusebiovic
Posts: 732
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 1246 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post eusebiovic »

It's become a running joke with Paqueta now...He does it so often that other teams actively press and target him for that very reason.

Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Costs us yet another goal and potentially 2 points.

Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:35
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks 
You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Yep and we also didn't lose or won the previous times we played the same opposition with him in the team therefore the results didn't improve..
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1471
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 329 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Come On You Irons »

fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:20
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match. 
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks 
You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:20
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:15
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match. 
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks

Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof... 
Post Reply