Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Crapaqueta

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1524
Been liked: 369 times

Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.
GBHammer63
Posts: 478
Old WHO Number: 220787
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post GBHammer63 »

fraser wrote: 30 Jan 2026, 01:39
GBHammer63 wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 20:36
fraser wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 17:11
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.

But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering. 
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done. 
I’m not getting this argument, if the FA have caused the (alleged ) mental suffering surely he’d feel better by attacking the ones who caused the problem as soon as he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. Not just accepting the hurt dished out by people at the FA, up sticks and go to Brazil, best therapy is teaching them a lesson, no?
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

GBHammer63 wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 20:36
fraser wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 17:11
GBHammer63 wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 16:11
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.

But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering. 
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done. 
Any Old Iron
Posts: 713
Old WHO Number: 10365
Has liked: 400 times
Been liked: 189 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Any Old Iron »

I’m very pleased to see the back of this cսnt. I think his behaviour this season has been disgusting, particularly in view of all the support he got from the club during the betting investigation. I lost patience with the self centered git after his disgraceful antics in the Liverpool game. 
The bloke was poison and the team will be better without him.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 1044
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 648 times
Been liked: 453 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

pdcwhu wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 21:10 Imagine how ardilles felt playing in England when youz invaded them 
 
 
Fuuuuuuuuuuucking hell.
When the fuck did we invade the argies?
Think you'd be better off on a Celtic forum, fenian cսnt.
pdcwhu
Posts: 413
Old WHO Number: 15211
Has liked: 278 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post pdcwhu »

Look at all my posts supporting Paq...the FA should be investigated when they were wrong,no apology..... CUNTS 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

What was troubling him once he'd been officially cleared in the Summer before the season got under way and was then seen chucking imaginary mobiles away beaming like a Cheshire cսnt once he scored a penalty up at the City Ground? Or was promptly leaving this January really more to do with continually playing dogshit deep in a relegation battle he hadn't the stomach for? That also coincided with a public embarrassing display from behaving like a spoilt child getting himself needlessly sent off against Liverpool on the same day of the sad passing of a true West Ham Great of all fucking days.. Don't buy it for a second. The timing of it all stinks.

He only ever thinks about himself and left us right in the lurch when the Club needed him most, practically begged him to stay (including Nuno) till the end of the season after all the Club had done supporting him through his highly suspicious betting scandal in the Stands as well as behind the scenes. 

The Club were clearly let down by him with their response which says something in itself being as damning as it was saying thanks for nothing, pal.
GBHammer63
Posts: 478
Old WHO Number: 220787
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post GBHammer63 »

fraser wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 17:11
GBHammer63 wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 16:11
Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal. 
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.

But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering. 
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

GBHammer63 wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 16:11
Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal. 
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.

But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering. 
GBHammer63
Posts: 478
Old WHO Number: 220787
Has liked: 228 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post GBHammer63 »

Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal. 
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4515
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 1337 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post El Scorchio »

Swiss. wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 11:42 We could have got 80m for him from City if the FA hadn't screwed up. We should sue them for the 38m loss. 
I'd be tempted to. We don't owe the player anything now so if us digging for that puts him back in the shit, well then who fucking cares any longer?

It would be a very Sullivan thing to do as well. Moneygrab.
Swiss.
Posts: 2192
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 328 times
Been liked: 448 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Swiss. »

We could have got 80m for him from City if the FA hadn't screwed up. We should sue them for the 38m loss. 
Fortunes Hiding
Posts: 85
Has liked: 27 times
Been liked: 27 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Fortunes Hiding »

I think if you compare Tommy with Pacqueta. 

Obviously different players. When Pacqueta had “ hurt” his back during a game …can’t remember who it was against, and Pacqueta goes down injured and referee waves play on, Pacqueta half gets up.

Would Tommy have done that? I remember one game where Tommy got a kick to the head , had a cut and still tried to head the ball. 

Tommh will be remembered at West Ham long after we’ve stopped talking about Pacqueta. 

 
gpike
Posts: 158
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 47 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post gpike »

Wonder if he will pass the medical due to his dodgy back and all😀
simons
Posts: 190
Has liked: 147 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post simons »

Modern day footballer (usually foreign) angling for a move:

Throw a strop

Refuse to play or train

Cite mental heath issues


VOILA! 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4668
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 602 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Manuel »

I wouldn't go as far as Rossal, and think the fee we got for him has possibly tempered the dislike/hate towards him. Add to that he's gone home (bless him) so it's not like he has joined another PL club.

However, what he is (was) is a massive drama queen, a man-child, and a one person soap opera, but he was never good enough to warrant such attention. Maradona, he most certainly isn't.

Do I wish him well? Nope. I'm just glad that he's down the road and the whole saga that follows him around is finally over.

The statement put out by the club says it all about how they feel about him, and on this occasion I would side with them.
Rossal
Posts: 1007
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 152 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Rossal »

Paqueta is a cսnt end of. 

We stood by him for years over the betting shit. Betting shit which seems to much of a massive coincidence not to have any truth of it.  Years of underperforming, tantrums and suspensions whilst paying him a fortune and he can't even see the season out to try and get us out the mess he was part of creating. 

'I never refused to play or ask to leave'  What a load of bollocks that is. Saying that he has fell out of love with it etc, pathetic excuses. Could of shown a bit of loyalty and also could of been available while it was being sorted out. 

An absolute rat, who given the fee we are getting, i'll drive him to the airport myself. Just hope he is replaced and will have a big smile on my face if he misses out on the world cup squad. 
dealcanvey
Posts: 632
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 128 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post dealcanvey »

Can’t blame him for wanting to take his family home. Could have waited until the end of the season though. Does feel as if he has jumped a sinking ship as soon as possible. 

great on his day which was about 3 games a season but most of the time he was a maverick. Was about him and him only rather than the team. We won’t miss him as we can’t afford to carry him in our situation. 





 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal. 
Then your hatred must have blinded you.. If you couldn't see what was right in front of your eyes, the crying against the cunts the breakdown when he got sent off... After 2 years of being persecuted you don't think that would get to him and it was all an act. 

No need to answer it's a rhetorical question 


Maybe Soucek was  lying and just seeking attention it's not like he's been through what Paqueta has...  I don't actually think that but how typical of you that a player you love comes out with it and you're full of sympathy and admiration... One you dislike does and he's lying and making it up.. 

Same goes for Sullivan and the club don't trust him he's lying.. 
It's Paqueta... Must be him can't be Sullivan 

​​​​​​
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8460
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4921 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 21:03
simons wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 20:54 No animosity, but I’m only interested in players who want to play for us. 

Mental elf is an easy cop out nowadays. Not that it might not be true, but It’s literally a free pass for being a bit of a cսnt in any walk of life. 

Souček will never have the quality that Paquetá undoubtedly has, but he’s twice the man he’ll ever be, and I’m much happier seeing him pull on a shirt, with a smile on his face, even if he’s battling his own demons too.

Note to club : stay away from South Americans in the future. They’re generally agg in the long run. 



 

And Souceks mental health is well documented now although at the time he was struggling he kept it to himself and never used as an excuse during that period or use it as an excuse to get away from the Club. If anything he used it to inspire him to do better and to come back fighting. Like you say, twice the man than Paqueta.
Someone coping with their mental health differently to someone else makes him less of a man? 

There's a thread at the top of this forum maybe you should read it and stop being a cսnt, go and tell some of them how they're not a man. 

Seriously for someone who doesn't rate him at all you're very bitter about him and can hardly post anything without mentioning him

Now if Kilman was accused of refusing to play I'd be delighted and grateful I wouldn't be making constant bitter posts about him I'd just be relieved he's gone now.. 
​​​​​
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 2355
Has liked: 1529 times
Been liked: 812 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

smartypants wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 19:36 We all just need to remember that he was off to City 2 years ago, if he’d had his way.  
This
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

pdcwhu wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 21:10 Imagine how ardilles felt playing in England when youz invaded them 
Imagine hating the English but loving an English football team and always cunting off it's English fans 
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 2355
Has liked: 1529 times
Been liked: 812 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

pdcwhu wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 21:10 Imagine how ardilles felt playing in England when youz invaded them 
Fuck off and rot slowly from aids  you rancid  minge 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3358
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 680 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Nobody knows the truth about what happened, what I do know is the club have form for making out players to be the instigators. 

There are rumours we tried to force him to Villa in the summer but he only wanted to go home. 

Same this window we wanted to sell him but he only wanted to go home. 

There are also rumours he refused to play, yet when he has agreed to join City and we allowed it he asked not to play didn't demand didn't refuse and played. 

If you dislike a player it's better to believe its them than the club.. But then other times nobody believes the nonsense coming from the clubs mouthpieces, selective believing. 





​​
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4668
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 213 times
Been liked: 602 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Manuel »

Well some rated him higher than I did, that's for sure, a 'creative player' who barley created anything? Not for me. Remembered for one pass and for being good at penalties, marvelous! I don't begrudge him a move home though (bless his cotton socks) as he says he had options in Europe, and I don't doubt that.

Adios, and in the words of WHO, good luck to him. One bit of advice though, remember the idea of football is to pass to a team mate and not the other side. Toodle pip.
Post Reply