Crapaqueta
Posted: 30 Nov 2025, 16:06
Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.
Out the door 1st Jan.
Out the door 1st Jan.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
http://52.56.107.89/
Crapaqueta
Page 5 of 13
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 28 Jan 2026, 16:10
Paquita gone... I'm a bit indifferent but wish him well... the betting thingy ruined him imo.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 22:30
wils wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 21:39fraser wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 20:46Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals.He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them.
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.
Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.
I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team.
He also missed the Wolves game easily our worst performance of the season... Selective facts... So easy to pick games.. We also didn't win other games he missed... It's utter nonsense.. Not just him but any single player...
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 22:18
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 21:51
It's hard to protect your own stupidity, isn't it 
Paqueta in Brazil makes us better
Paqueta in Brazil makes us better
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 21:49
wils wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 21:39fraser wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 20:46Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals.He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them.
Not even statistically significant
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.
Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.
I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team.
Not even statistically significant
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 21:39
fraser wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 20:46Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals.
He missed 5 games in 2025. We won 2 and only lost 1 of them.
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.
Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.
I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team.
He missed 2 games in 2026 so far, we won both of them.
Winning 4 and losing only 1 out of the 7 he hasn't played is significant for a team that has won so few games over the last year or so.
I know it's a simplistic take, but I have long held that his play (losing possession, diving all the time) undermines the team.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 20:52
When he scored his penalty against Brighton, he celebrated like he'd won us the game single handedly...
bloke infront of me at the LS pointed out that when Welbeck scored his first penalty he ran into the goal, picked up the ball and jogged back to the centre spot.
It's all about him
bloke infront of me at the LS pointed out that when Welbeck scored his first penalty he ran into the goal, picked up the ball and jogged back to the centre spot.
It's all about him
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 20:47
He's poisonous
I cant believe the rest of the squad don't see that too
Fellow Portuguese speaker Fernandes, who was a doubt today, clearly doesn't miss him
I cant believe the rest of the squad don't see that too
Fellow Portuguese speaker Fernandes, who was a doubt today, clearly doesn't miss him
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 20:46
Oh come on that's just silly, we beat QPR because Fernandes wasn't playing after he was when we lost 3-0 to Wolves, we lost 3-0 to Wolves cause Paqueta wasn't playing... We hadn't won a league game without Paqueta before today... Anything can be twisted like that... They're all in it together and it isn't down to any individuals.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 20:45
Agitating for a move for weeks. Show boating selfish cսnt, hope we get some money for him and get a CB and a keeper who can come and take a cross and we might get somewhere
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 19:31
Paqueta not playing for last two games now. Let's have a look at the results.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 16 Jan 2026, 11:01
Has he fucked off yet
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 23:34
His head has gone since the FA crap (I still wonder if it was some underhand tactic to stop his big move?)
now I’m sorry for him but he needs to go home and find his head again. Get his mojo back.
hes playing 4/10
most games and feels we owe him a living.
sell at best price we can get
replace with best we can sign
cross fingers
now I’m sorry for him but he needs to go home and find his head again. Get his mojo back.
hes playing 4/10
most games and feels we owe him a living.
sell at best price we can get
replace with best we can sign
cross fingers
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 23:27
He's an occasional match of the day player .
I'm BORED with him and his baggage.
30 M British pounds is acceptable to me at this point.
Having people that don't want to be there and are ultimately unhappy is never a good thing.
Without all that carry on with the betting he'd have been gone two yrs ago FFS.
I'm BORED with him and his baggage.
30 M British pounds is acceptable to me at this point.
Having people that don't want to be there and are ultimately unhappy is never a good thing.
Without all that carry on with the betting he'd have been gone two yrs ago FFS.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 23:20
Nutsin wrote: ↑15 Jan 2026, 16:03 He is way overrated, get rid asap. Bring in someone who doesn’t give the ball away all the time. This idiot learned nothing in his time with us, he is stuck on stupid.
Use the money on a quality young center half and bring in a holding midfielder with some pace.
This needs to be the absolute minimum we need to do this window.
'Center' ...turned full yank aintcha 
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 17:22
Agree Nutsin although getting in the right players, or for that fact any players, is always the risk with Sullivan. He may just see the fee as a way to cover much of the cost of the two lads brought in and look instead for some budget fee, stop gaps. Old, slow, high wages, no resale value are the usual attributes that we ( or should I say Sully ) goes for.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 16:03
He is way overrated, get rid asap. Bring in someone who doesn’t give the ball away all the time. This idiot learned nothing in his time with us, he is stuck on stupid.
Use the money on a quality young center half and bring in a holding midfielder with some pace.
This needs to be the absolute minimum we need to do this window.
Use the money on a quality young center half and bring in a holding midfielder with some pace.
This needs to be the absolute minimum we need to do this window.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:45
Having this bloke hang around like a bad smell doesn’t sit very well with me at all.
if he were to play out of his skin, and contribute to some much needed points, it would only beg the question why couldn’t he have tried a bit more in the previous games this season?
He can fuck off. And when he gets there, he can fuck off some more.
if he were to play out of his skin, and contribute to some much needed points, it would only beg the question why couldn’t he have tried a bit more in the previous games this season?
He can fuck off. And when he gets there, he can fuck off some more.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:43
It does not matter how good he is (dont rate him as high as others). He simply does not want to play for us. We aren't in the position to dig our heels in on this one. Sell him and move on.
He wont be playing against spurs at the weekend and he should not either. Nuno and the club are delaying the inevitable in trying to keep him here or holding out for a price we wont get.
He wont be playing against spurs at the weekend and he should not either. Nuno and the club are delaying the inevitable in trying to keep him here or holding out for a price we wont get.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:30
Mate of mine was there at the time no reason to doubt him tbf
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 15:13
AKA ERNIE" wrote: ↑15 Jan 2026, 14:41 No mate he didn't he told nuno on sat he did have a bad medics found fuck all wrong with his back he then had a strop and said no I can't play and stormed off
Where's this from?
No less likely to be true than all the other rumours I suppose. But that's all they are rumours so who knows which ones are true
No less likely to be true than all the other rumours I suppose. But that's all they are rumours so who knows which ones are true
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 14:41
No mate he didn't he told nuno on sat he did have a bad medics found fuck all wrong with his back he then had a strop and said no I can't play and stormed off
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 14:31
Steinberg saying we are happy to sell him but only if Flamengo loan him back till end of season
why on earth would they agree to that? Sullivan really is a joke
just sell the useless cսnt and get a few players in
why on earth would they agree to that? Sullivan really is a joke
just sell the useless cսnt and get a few players in
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 13:25
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑14 Jan 2026, 23:51 He's generally shit wherever he's asked to play bar the occasional rare game in the Premier League. He doesn't suit any position consistently enough in it. 3rd rate cup competitions or French/Brazilian Leagues he can do a bit better in.
Sounds like he is in his way... 40 m is a fair price for a bloke who by and large has been a total liability
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 13:24
So it seems he has had a bad back and didn't refuse to play against QPR.