AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
El Scorchio" wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 14:01 To be fair, I was listening to Arry talking to Geo about the match and he said that from his experience as a manager, it didn't really matter what Nuno did or didn't do and it was Chelsea putting the pressure on us and driving us back regardless. Geo definitely tried to lead him into saying bringing Kilman on was a mistake, but he said it wouldn't have mattered whether he bought on a defender or an attacker. The tide had turned.
The issue with Nuno is he invites pressure to the shittest part of our team. The defence......especially one with Kilman in it. The way to relieve pressure was to stop them coming at us, by getting stuck in again in the midfield with fresh legs and continuing to press high with fresh legs up top. Now the fresh legs up top bit is a no go due to the shit squad planning but he could have put some legs in midfield to get us 10-15 yards higher.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2625
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 433 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Yep, agree with 'Arry on that.
Can't really blame Nuno. He set us up brilliantly in that first half, and even at the start of the 2nd, we were going for a 3rd.
And should've gone 3-2 up at the end before they went and won it.
Can't really blame Nuno. He set us up brilliantly in that first half, and even at the start of the 2nd, we were going for a 3rd.
And should've gone 3-2 up at the end before they went and won it.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4522
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 271 times
- Been liked: 1342 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
To be fair, I was listening to Arry talking to Geo about the match and he said that from his experience as a manager, it didn't really matter what Nuno did or didn't do and it was Chelsea putting the pressure on us and driving us back regardless. Geo definitely tried to lead him into saying bringing Kilman on was a mistake, but he said it wouldn't have mattered whether he bought on a defender or an attacker. The tide had turned.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Issue is always gonna be nuno's negative tactics.
Unlucky not being 3 or 4 up on saturday, but to go so fucking defensive so early was ridiculous.
99% of us knew the game was lost as soon as he bought that useless cսnt kilman on.
Play to our strengths and we have a chance and our strengths are certainly not defending, even Burnley have better centre backs.
Unlucky not being 3 or 4 up on saturday, but to go so fucking defensive so early was ridiculous.
99% of us knew the game was lost as soon as he bought that useless cսnt kilman on.
Play to our strengths and we have a chance and our strengths are certainly not defending, even Burnley have better centre backs.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4522
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 271 times
- Been liked: 1342 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
We should beat Burnley and indeed we must. However our already weak defence is now an enormous question mark. Kilman and Mav together puts the shits right up me. Do we start Disasi, if he's even ready to start? Do we plug in Magassa or Soucek there? You'd have to be tempted.
-
Westham67
- Posts: 1304
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 435 times
- Been liked: 159 times
- Contact:
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
3 against Sunderland in the first half and 2 against Chelsea in the second half, so I think we will have too much for Burnley
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 12:16 We have failed every “biggest game of the season” so far and the run of them around xmas.
On what planet does anyone think we will be mentally or physically strong enough to overcome Burnley with their crowd feeling its genuinely a chance for a rare win.
If its purely a law if probability thing fine but can anyone explain how we use our painfully thin squad to not materially weaken when we have to sub our front 2 and others which we gave to do most games. Not using Potts and Magassa and the legs of someone like Mayers or KWP seems to be the only option not tried by Nuno. But even if we do that, not having Todibo and having to play Kilman feels like a death sentence?
Come on Alf, its a Burnley team who havent won their last 7 at home. Our last two away performances have been decent, especially the first half on sat. Play like that it should be good enough for 3 points. Long as Nuno doesnt sit back.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
We have failed every “biggest game of the season” so far and the run of them around xmas.
On what planet does anyone think we will be mentally or physically strong enough to overcome Burnley with their crowd feeling its genuinely a chance for a rare win.
If its purely a law if probability thing fine but can anyone explain how we use our painfully thin squad to not materially weaken when we have to sub our front 2 and others which we gave to do most games. Not using Potts and Magassa and the legs of someone like Mayers or KWP seems to be the only option not tried by Nuno. But even if we do that, not having Todibo and having to play Kilman feels like a death sentence?
On what planet does anyone think we will be mentally or physically strong enough to overcome Burnley with their crowd feeling its genuinely a chance for a rare win.
If its purely a law if probability thing fine but can anyone explain how we use our painfully thin squad to not materially weaken when we have to sub our front 2 and others which we gave to do most games. Not using Potts and Magassa and the legs of someone like Mayers or KWP seems to be the only option not tried by Nuno. But even if we do that, not having Todibo and having to play Kilman feels like a death sentence?
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 2012
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 403 times
- Been liked: 962 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Tomshardware wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 08:21 A win against Burnley and we will be on the coattails of either Leeds or Forest or both if they draw on Friday evening.
We've got to outperform Leeds by 4 points between now and the last day of the season to have it in our hands to stay up.
Obviously we'd then lose that last game...but to at least be in the running on the last day feels acheivable.
Obviously we'd then lose that last game...but to at least be in the running on the last day feels acheivable.
-
Russ of the BML
- Posts: 1324
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 537 times
- Been liked: 524 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Burnley is now possibly our biggest game of the season. Just to set up the next game which will then be the biggest game of the season and so on and so forth.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2625
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 433 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 09:06 I didn’t realise that we have gone 21 league games without a clean sheetplus the 5th worse defensive record in Europe.
Phenomenal.
That's why we snapped up Disasi mate.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 3011
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 129 times
- Been liked: 706 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
I didn’t realise that we have gone 21 league games without a clean sheet
plus the 5th worse defensive record in Europe.
Phenomenal.
Phenomenal.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 1359
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 742 times
- Been liked: 343 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
A win against Burnley and we will be on the coattails of either Leeds or Forest or both if they draw on Friday evening.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Rossal wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 08:04 Got a load of grief a month ago for calling it an asset strip and Sullivan happy to go down whilst pocketing cash.
After that window leaving our squad thinner and a negative net spend.....
Where is the intent to stay up and where is the money? Anyone care to explain.....
He threw in the towel after Forest.
I hate myself for saying it, but from a financial perspective he was probably right, no point digging this hole any deeper.
I hate myself for saying it, but from a financial perspective he was probably right, no point digging this hole any deeper.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Got a load of grief a month ago for calling it an asset strip and Sullivan happy to go down whilst pocketing cash.
After that window leaving our squad thinner and a negative net spend.....
Where is the intent to stay up and where is the money? Anyone care to explain.....
After that window leaving our squad thinner and a negative net spend.....
Where is the intent to stay up and where is the money? Anyone care to explain.....
- Manuel
- Posts: 4674
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 214 times
- Been liked: 603 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026, 06:08 "In West Ham's case, despite a gut-wrenching 3-2 defeat by Chelsea on Saturday night, the numbers make for slightly better reading, with the Hammers' chance of safety rated at 17.06%.
With a game against strugglers Burnley to come next week, West Ham - who looked dead and buried a month ago - are now starting to play with the freedom of a side with nothing to lose and everything to gain"
The beeb puts a stat and a bit of hope.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/arti ... dgjj6e31mo
There is no doubt at all we are looking a lot better right now, and if we carry on playing as we are we WILL win games, the question is will we win enough. We will know a lot more come Saturday tea time on our survival chances.
- Mex Martillo
- Posts: 1982
- Location: Catalonia
- Old WHO Number: 11796
- Has liked: 357 times
- Been liked: 310 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
"In West Ham's case, despite a gut-wrenching 3-2 defeat by Chelsea on Saturday night, the numbers make for slightly better reading, with the Hammers' chance of safety rated at 17.06%.
With a game against strugglers Burnley to come next week, West Ham - who looked dead and buried a month ago - are now starting to play with the freedom of a side with nothing to lose and everything to gain"
The beeb puts a stat and a bit of hope.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/arti ... dgjj6e31mo
With a game against strugglers Burnley to come next week, West Ham - who looked dead and buried a month ago - are now starting to play with the freedom of a side with nothing to lose and everything to gain"
The beeb puts a stat and a bit of hope.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/arti ... dgjj6e31mo
- Manuel
- Posts: 4674
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 214 times
- Been liked: 603 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026, 22:41 I've long thought Leeds would be the one's to catch realistically. They are the newly promoted Club with a manager who will feel the pressure and someone who has struggled in the past to keep them in the division (Leeds and Norwich) so he doesn't have the know-how, Dyche does who also has a better set up at Forest. We play them last game of the season at the cesspit and I think is our best bet of staying up. What I don't want to see Friday is Leeds winning, a draw or Forest winning would feel the better outcome for me.
What a desperate fucking mess though to be in thanks to Nuno and the Owners.
Exactly what I think, it's Leeds or no-one. All this talk about Palace and Spurs is just fanciful. They have a tough Feb and we have them at home still. We do not want them to win on Friday.
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Bless you lads. While its mathematically possible to survive, fans can still hope I guess but for me its been over since xmas. Too weak in key areas of the squad before the season began and not addressed this window. Burnley will see us as a chance for 3 points and beat us I think especially since Kilman and Mavropanos will start.
Sullivan is only interested in managing the cash flow now to keep the listless ship, that is West Ham, afloat for the immediate term before we go down.
Sullivan, when we go down, will officially become the worst owner in our 126 year history. Screwed the club over financially and as a footballing force and we will be back to where we were in the 1950s, a second tier club.
Sullivan is only interested in managing the cash flow now to keep the listless ship, that is West Ham, afloat for the immediate term before we go down.
Sullivan, when we go down, will officially become the worst owner in our 126 year history. Screwed the club over financially and as a footballing force and we will be back to where we were in the 1950s, a second tier club.
-
Leonard Hatred
- Posts: 2764
- Old WHO Number: 209880
- Has liked: 193 times
- Been liked: 295 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Can't really see us getting out of this.
Gannin doon like a homesick mole.
Gannin doon like a homesick mole.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8472
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4931 times
- Been liked: 2648 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
I've long thought Leeds would be the one's to catch realistically. They are the newly promoted Club with a manager who will feel the pressure and someone who has struggled in the past to keep them in the division (Leeds and Norwich) so he doesn't have the know-how, Dyche does who also has a better set up at Forest. We play them last game of the season at the cesspit and I think is our best bet of staying up. What I don't want to see Friday is Leeds winning, a draw or Forest winning would feel the better outcome for me.
What a desperate fucking mess though to be in thanks to Nuno and the Owners.
What a desperate fucking mess though to be in thanks to Nuno and the Owners.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2625
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 433 times
- Mex Martillo
- Posts: 1982
- Location: Catalonia
- Old WHO Number: 11796
- Has liked: 357 times
- Been liked: 310 times
Re: West Ham United 25/26 relegation thread
Just a point conceded to Forest, not a great change. Still time and points. Take it game at a time blar blar blar.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 3011
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 129 times
- Been liked: 706 times
