Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

US Politics Thread

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply

Trump: Smart Cookie or Orange Oaf?

Smart Cookie
10
25%
Orange Oaf
30
75%
 
Total votes: 40

User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 2012
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 403 times
Been liked: 962 times

US Politics Thread

Post stubbo-admin »

Seems like the main politics thread is becoming a Yankee-Doodle Trump-fest, so maybe scope here to split them out.

Will see if this one gains any traction ..if it does will move over a few of the million posts from our two protagonists from the other thread.

Yee-haaa!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 16:08
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:55
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:27
Actually it had a 98 handle not too long ago. You might want to check. 

Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
I'm not the one coming on here telling everyone to short oil. You wanna give stupid advise then expect people to laugh at you.

The bigger picture being that your orange rapist hero has managed to balls up the global economy again, making the every day goods even more expensive for millions of people.
Yeah just what I thought. 

Looks like Trump is tackling the real issues facing the world, a transitory spike in the price of oil and increase in inflation is worth the short term pain for the benefit we all will gain.


But then of course you already know that. You’re just not all there!

Funny how you can only repeat the propaganda you are fed by the liberal media. One of these days you’ll have an original thought you can call your own.


Here’s a tip you never go long near previous highs you thick cսnt!
Here's a tip, don't short global commodoties facing the biggest supply shock in decades.

which propaganda am i repeating exactly?
is this gonna be like the "tariffs aren't inflationary thing"? or the "foreign countries will pay the tariffs" thing?
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:55
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:27
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:20
so you went to bed at $110 and now its $105.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.

as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.

biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
Actually it had a 98 handle not too long ago. You might want to check. 

Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
I'm not the one coming on here telling everyone to short oil. You wanna give stupid advise then expect people to laugh at you.

The bigger picture being that your orange rapist hero has managed to balls up the global economy again, making the every day goods even more expensive for millions of people.
Yeah just what I thought. 

Looks like Trump is tackling the real issues facing the world, a transitory spike in the price of oil and increase in inflation is worth the short term pain for the benefit we all will gain.


But then of course you already know that. You’re just not all there!

Funny how you can only repeat the propaganda you are fed by the liberal media. One of these days you’ll have an original thought you can call your own.


Here’s a tip you never go long near previous highs you thick cսnt!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:27
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:20
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:16
No, I was sleeping but I knew $120 was resistance. It’s not like it was a secret ffs!
so you went to bed at $110 and now its $105.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.

as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.

biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
Actually it had a 98 handle not too long ago. You might want to check. 

Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
I'm not the one coming on here telling everyone to short oil. You wanna give stupid advise then expect people to laugh at you.

The bigger picture being that your orange rapist hero has managed to balls up the global economy again, making the every day goods even more expensive for millions of people.
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:20
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:16
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:10 I must have missed when it hit $92.
Unless you have gone back in time to Friday of last week to claim your 'win' lol

$105 at the moment.
Biggest supply shock in decades but yeh don't forget about the Fibonacci lines 😀

so you shorted at $120 right?
No, I was sleeping but I knew $120 was resistance. It’s not like it was a secret ffs!
so you went to bed at $110 and now its $105.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.

as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.

biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
Actually it had a 98 handle not too long ago. You might want to check. 

Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:16
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:10 I must have missed when it hit $92.
Unless you have gone back in time to Friday of last week to claim your 'win' lol

$105 at the moment.
Biggest supply shock in decades but yeh don't forget about the Fibonacci lines 😀

so you shorted at $120 right?
No, I was sleeping but I knew $120 was resistance. It’s not like it was a secret ffs!
so you went to bed at $110 and now its $105.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.

as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.

biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 15:10 I must have missed when it hit $92.
Unless you have gone back in time to Friday of last week to claim your 'win' lol

$105 at the moment.
Biggest supply shock in decades but yeh don't forget about the Fibonacci lines 😀

so you shorted at $120 right?
No, I was sleeping but I knew $120 was resistance. It’s not like it was a secret ffs!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

I must have missed when it hit $92.
Unless you have gone back in time to Friday of last week to claim your 'win' lol

$105 at the moment.
Biggest supply shock in decades but yeh don't forget about the Fibonacci lines 😀

so you shorted at $120 right?
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

dealcanvey wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 14:54 Shame Nutsin wont answer the question.
But to help you out, I’ll be looking to take profits at the 50% retracement level and looking to buy back in Long at $92 should it fill the gap. I won’t go long until the gap is filled.

Hope that helps.

I’ll continue to short $120 per barrel when it retests, that would be my first layer (dollar cost averaging) with my second layer at around $130. 3rd layer at $147 should it get there.
Which Is doubtful!


Im the only one on here who puts it up there before it happens, I did it with Nvidia and other tech stock when it was getting clobbered and goose was on here acting like a giddy school girl. I actually bought close to the bottom of the move.

So my track record is far better than Goose’s.
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

dealcanvey wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 14:54 Shame Nutsin wont answer the question.
I know, seeing as I’m the only one who is calling the market correctly.

it’s dropped $20 per barrel since Goose came on here wetting his knickers. Just like I said it would.

Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

The 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level has support at 102.25

the 50% retracement is at 96.38%

 
dealcanvey
Posts: 632
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 128 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post dealcanvey »

Shame Nutsin wont answer the question.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 14:41
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:56
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:51
You’re not all there mate!
Every time you post that I know you’ve realised you’re wrong.
Biggest supply side shock in years and you’re telling people to short oil 😂 
All you’re doing is exposing just how little you know about technical analysis.

And the oil market.


You’re just too stupid to realize it.

As I said you are not all there!
technical analysis lol

what do you suppose is driving oil prices up at the moment?
a) technical analysis
b) supply
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:56
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:51
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:34

And what’s is the upside?

If you were betting a tenner now are you betting on the priec of oil going up or down?
You’re not all there mate!
Every time you post that I know you’ve realised you’re wrong.
Biggest supply side shock in years and you’re telling people to short oil 😂 
All you’re doing is exposing just how little you know about technical analysis.

And the oil market.


You’re just too stupid to realize it.

As I said you are not all there!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:51
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:34
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:27
I already told you the down side target is $92.

Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
And what’s is the upside?

If you were betting a tenner now are you betting on the priec of oil going up or down?
You’re not all there mate!
Every time you post that I know you’ve realised you’re wrong.
Biggest supply side shock in years and you’re telling people to short oil 😂 
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:34
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:27
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:08
 
hahahaha 😀😀😀 i love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.

I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.

this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact. 
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.

do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?
I already told you the down side target is $92.

Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
And what’s is the upside?

If you were betting a tenner now are you betting on the priec of oil going up or down?
You’re not all there mate!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:27
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:08
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:48
Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.

the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell. 

Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.


what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.

As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.


As you were!
 
hahahaha 😀😀😀 i love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.

I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.

this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact. 
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.

do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?
I already told you the down side target is $92.

Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
And what’s is the upside?

If you were betting a tenner now are you betting on the priec of oil going up or down?
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 13:08
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:48
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:28
And in the meantime it went to $119.

The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.

the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell. 

Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.


what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.

As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.


As you were!
 
hahahaha 😀😀😀 i love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.

I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.

this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact. 
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.

do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?
I already told you the down side target is $92.

Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:48
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:28
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:14
I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102


https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
And in the meantime it went to $119.

The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.

the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell. 

Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.


what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.

As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.


As you were!
 
hahahaha 😀😀😀 i love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.

I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.

this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact. 
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.

do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:28
Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:14
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 10:30 $120 a barrel now.
Let’s hope nobody took Nutsin’s advice to short oil @ $100 a barrel.

Meanwhile the orange twat welcomes back the bodies of dead servicemen while wearing a baseball cap that he couldn’t be bothered to remove.
I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102


https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
And in the meantime it went to $119.

The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.

the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell. 

Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.


what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.

As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.


As you were!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 12:14
goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 10:30 $120 a barrel now.
Let’s hope nobody took Nutsin’s advice to short oil @ $100 a barrel.

Meanwhile the orange twat welcomes back the bodies of dead servicemen while wearing a baseball cap that he couldn’t be bothered to remove.
I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102


https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
And in the meantime it went to $119.

The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4575
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 678 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Fauxstralian »

Nutsin is obviously not in the inner circle getting the intel
Seems Barren Trump (freak son of Donald) bought $30m of oil just before Dad started the war
Lucky or a genius?
More grift , more corruption from the Orange Family 
Nutsin
Posts: 3672
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 440 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 10:30 $120 a barrel now.
Let’s hope nobody took Nutsin’s advice to short oil @ $100 a barrel.

Meanwhile the orange twat welcomes back the bodies of dead servicemen while wearing a baseball cap that he couldn’t be bothered to remove.
I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102


https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6385
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 577 times
Been liked: 1120 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post goose »

Massive Attack" wrote: 09 Mar 2026, 11:41 In a year's time most will look back and thank Trump for doing this. The scores of Iranians celebrating it around the world have already started. 
 
In a year’s time there will be higher prices for everything and higher mortgage rates again (if this continues). Only people celebrating are those in Israel or anyone not living in the ME.

Destabilising the region and starting an economic shockwave won’t be celebrated by anyone.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8464
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4925 times
Been liked: 2646 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post Massive Attack »

In a year's time most will look back and thank Trump for doing this. The scores of Iranians celebrating it around the world have already started. 
dealcanvey
Posts: 632
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 128 times

Re: US Politics Thread

Post dealcanvey »

Another stinker from Trump.

Starts another war.

Kills their leader. Hopes the people will overthrow the regime. Instead US forces kill a load of school kids in the process.

Zero protests from the Iranian people and instead leads to protests around the US and Europe. 

Iranian regime install ex leaders more radical son as their next ruler.

10/10.

 
Post Reply