AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
US Politics Thread
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 2012
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 403 times
- Been liked: 962 times
US Politics Thread
Seems like the main politics thread is becoming a Yankee-Doodle Trump-fest, so maybe scope here to split them out.
Will see if this one gains any traction ..if it does will move over a few of the million posts from our two protagonists from the other thread.
Yee-haaa!
Will see if this one gains any traction ..if it does will move over a few of the million posts from our two protagonists from the other thread.
Yee-haaa!
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 15:55I'm not the one coming on here telling everyone to short oil. You wanna give stupid advise then expect people to laugh at you.
The bigger picture being that your orange rapist hero has managed to balls up the global economy again, making the every day goods even more expensive for millions of people.
Yeah just what I thought.
Looks like Trump is tackling the real issues facing the world, a transitory spike in the price of oil and increase in inflation is worth the short term pain for the benefit we all will gain.
But then of course you already know that. You’re just not all there!
Funny how you can only repeat the propaganda you are fed by the liberal media. One of these days you’ll have an original thought you can call your own.
Here’s a tip you never go long near previous highs you thick cսnt!
Looks like Trump is tackling the real issues facing the world, a transitory spike in the price of oil and increase in inflation is worth the short term pain for the benefit we all will gain.
But then of course you already know that. You’re just not all there!
Funny how you can only repeat the propaganda you are fed by the liberal media. One of these days you’ll have an original thought you can call your own.
Here’s a tip you never go long near previous highs you thick cսnt!
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 15:27Actually it had a 98 handle not too long ago. You might want to check.
Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
I'm not the one coming on here telling everyone to short oil. You wanna give stupid advise then expect people to laugh at you.
The bigger picture being that your orange rapist hero has managed to balls up the global economy again, making the every day goods even more expensive for millions of people.
The bigger picture being that your orange rapist hero has managed to balls up the global economy again, making the every day goods even more expensive for millions of people.
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 15:20so you went to bed at $110 and now its $105.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.
as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.
biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
Actually it had a 98 handle not too long ago. You might want to check.
Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
Why don’t you tell us all how high it’s gonna go then numbnuts?
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
so you went to bed at $110 and now its $105.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.
as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.
biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
it never got below $100 but your wise advise was that its going to $92.
as is it wont be going anywhere near $92.
biggest supply shock since the 70's and you tell everyone to short oil.
Re: US Politics Thread
No, I was sleeping but I knew $120 was resistance. It’s not like it was a secret ffs!
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
I must have missed when it hit $92.
Unless you have gone back in time to Friday of last week to claim your 'win' lol
$105 at the moment.
Biggest supply shock in decades but yeh don't forget about the Fibonacci lines
so you shorted at $120 right?
Unless you have gone back in time to Friday of last week to claim your 'win' lol
$105 at the moment.
Biggest supply shock in decades but yeh don't forget about the Fibonacci lines
so you shorted at $120 right?
Re: US Politics Thread
But to help you out, I’ll be looking to take profits at the 50% retracement level and looking to buy back in Long at $92 should it fill the gap. I won’t go long until the gap is filled.
Hope that helps.
I’ll continue to short $120 per barrel when it retests, that would be my first layer (dollar cost averaging) with my second layer at around $130. 3rd layer at $147 should it get there.
Which Is doubtful!
Im the only one on here who puts it up there before it happens, I did it with Nvidia and other tech stock when it was getting clobbered and goose was on here acting like a giddy school girl. I actually bought close to the bottom of the move.
So my track record is far better than Goose’s.
Hope that helps.
I’ll continue to short $120 per barrel when it retests, that would be my first layer (dollar cost averaging) with my second layer at around $130. 3rd layer at $147 should it get there.
Which Is doubtful!
Im the only one on here who puts it up there before it happens, I did it with Nvidia and other tech stock when it was getting clobbered and goose was on here acting like a giddy school girl. I actually bought close to the bottom of the move.
So my track record is far better than Goose’s.
Re: US Politics Thread
I know, seeing as I’m the only one who is calling the market correctly.
it’s dropped $20 per barrel since Goose came on here wetting his knickers. Just like I said it would.
it’s dropped $20 per barrel since Goose came on here wetting his knickers. Just like I said it would.
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 632
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 43 times
- Been liked: 128 times
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
technical analysis lol
what do you suppose is driving oil prices up at the moment?
a) technical analysis
b) supply
what do you suppose is driving oil prices up at the moment?
a) technical analysis
b) supply
Re: US Politics Thread
All you’re doing is exposing just how little you know about technical analysis.
And the oil market.
You’re just too stupid to realize it.
As I said you are not all there!
And the oil market.
You’re just too stupid to realize it.
As I said you are not all there!
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Every time you post that I know you’ve realised you’re wrong.
Biggest supply side shock in years and you’re telling people to short oil
Biggest supply side shock in years and you’re telling people to short oil
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:34And what’s is the upside?Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:27goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:08hahahahai love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.
I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.
this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact.
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.
do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?I already told you the down side target is $92.
Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
If you were betting a tenner now are you betting on the priec of oil going up or down?
You’re not all there mate!
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
And what’s is the upside?Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:27goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:08Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:48Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.
the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell.
Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.
what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.
As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.
As you were!hahahahai love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.
I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.
this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact.
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.
do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?I already told you the down side target is $92.
Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
If you were betting a tenner now are you betting on the priec of oil going up or down?
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 13:08Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:48Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.
the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell.
Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.
what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.
As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.
As you were!hahahahai love it when you pretend to be some kind of 'day trader'.
I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.
this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact.
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.
do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?
I already told you the down side target is $92.
Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
Can’t you read? Or are you having difficulty with comprehension again?
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:48goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:28Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:14I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102
https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chartAnd in the meantime it went to $119.
The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.
the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell.
Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.
what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.
As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.
As you were!
I think the intra-day cost absolutely matters if you cannot afford to fund that loss.
this is the biggest supply shock the oil industry has seen since the 70's. the longer this goes on, the larger and longer the impact.
biggest supply side impact and you're telling people to short oil.
do you think there is more chance of oil going to $80 or $120?
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:28Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:14I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102
https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chartAnd in the meantime it went to $119.
The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
Ok now pay attention numbnuts I’m gonna educate you on trading.
the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell.
Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.
what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.
As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.
As you were!
the previous high in 2022 ( start of Ukraine war) was approx $120 per barrell. Prior to that it was 2008 at approx $147 per barrell.
Friday’s close was approx $92 per barrell. It’s the closing price that matters not intraday prices.
what we have is a gap up and a test of a previous high.it is known as back and fill to secure the move for prices to go back to test the previous close. This is what they mean by technicals.
As for the fundamentals If you think OPEC the CME group and others are gonna sit back and do nothing then you are more clueless than I thought.
As you were!
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Nutsin wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 12:14I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102
https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
And in the meantime it went to $119.
The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
The only way is comes down is if this ‘war’ ends. Do you see that happening?
The longer this goes on you’re looking at higher prices not lower.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4575
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 79 times
- Been liked: 678 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Nutsin is obviously not in the inner circle getting the intel
Seems Barren Trump (freak son of Donald) bought $30m of oil just before Dad started the war
Lucky or a genius?
More grift , more corruption from the Orange Family
Seems Barren Trump (freak son of Donald) bought $30m of oil just before Dad started the war
Lucky or a genius?
More grift , more corruption from the Orange Family
Re: US Politics Thread
I went to bed oil was at $110 per barrel now it’s at $102
https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
https://www.macrotrends.net/2566/crude- ... live-chart
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 11:41 In a year's time most will look back and thank Trump for doing this. The scores of Iranians celebrating it around the world have already started.
Destabilising the region and starting an economic shockwave won’t be celebrated by anyone.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8459
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4921 times
- Been liked: 2646 times
Re: US Politics Thread
In a year's time most will look back and thank Trump for doing this. The scores of Iranians celebrating it around the world have already started.
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 632
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 43 times
- Been liked: 128 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Another stinker from Trump.
Starts another war.
Kills their leader. Hopes the people will overthrow the regime. Instead US forces kill a load of school kids in the process.
Zero protests from the Iranian people and instead leads to protests around the US and Europe.
Iranian regime install ex leaders more radical son as their next ruler.
10/10.
Starts another war.
Kills their leader. Hopes the people will overthrow the regime. Instead US forces kill a load of school kids in the process.
Zero protests from the Iranian people and instead leads to protests around the US and Europe.
Iranian regime install ex leaders more radical son as their next ruler.
10/10.
- goose
- Posts: 6385
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 577 times
- Been liked: 1120 times
Re: US Politics Thread
$120 a barrel now.
Let’s hope nobody took Nutsin’s advice to short oil @ $100 a barrel.
Meanwhile the orange twat welcomes back the bodies of dead servicemen while wearing a baseball cap that he couldn’t be bothered to remove.
Let’s hope nobody took Nutsin’s advice to short oil @ $100 a barrel.
Meanwhile the orange twat welcomes back the bodies of dead servicemen while wearing a baseball cap that he couldn’t be bothered to remove.